tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628674231200432344.post2916766318222527907..comments2011-02-16T21:39:00.406-08:00
Owen Jarushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15680109565884420656noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628674231200432344.post-42325921399753177352011-02-16T21:39:00.406-08:002011-02-16T21:39:00.406-08:00Thank you for your comment AB.
Two points:
-The idea has been raised that Tall el-Hammam may be Sodom. If you go to the project's webpage and scroll down you'll see a discussion about it.
http://www.tallelhammam.com/
-I should caution, linking biblical events to archaeological events is a great, but interesting, challenge.
The Owenhttp://www.unreportedheritagenews.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628674231200432344.post-83429557097254544042011-02-16T14:29:13.988-08:002011-02-16T14:29:13.988-08:00Is it a coincidence that the "climate change disaster" took place about the same time that the Lord destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah? Genesis 13:10, ...Lot...beheld all the plain of Jordan, that it was well watered every where, before the Lord destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah... .
A cosmic impact event would fit the situation very well, don't you think?A B Chryslerhttp://openid.aol.com/abchryslernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628674231200432344.post-46888926796638844342011-02-16T02:56:43.002-08:002011-02-16T02:56:43.002-08:00The event 4200 years ago has been linked with a cool, arid episode of a type that has recurred every 1-2 thousand years throughout the past 10,000 years and probably longer (often known as "Bond events" after their discoverer). It looks as if such episodes are associated with changes in the North Atlantic circulation, although the drivers and mechanisms associated with such events are nickbrookshttp://nickbrooks.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628674231200432344.post-1448125913954635212011-02-16T02:44:05.001-08:002011-02-16T02:44:05.001-08:00The article mentions a possible comet strike that might have caused the weather changes. I do think the fact that other planets are experiencing climate change right now definitely points to something other than humans for climate change. Everyone should pay more attention to science right now to get answers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628674231200432344.post-30313944255589780362011-02-15T18:38:58.707-08:002011-02-15T18:38:58.707-08:00The Bible account of the time of Abraham reveals a great shift that affected all of Mesopotamia. The Bible reveals that drought crippled a large area of the middle east while Egypt was humid and lush. After this, Egypt became arid.
This is all post-flood climate change as the earth was undergoing changes.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628674231200432344.post-19503529340552558732011-02-15T18:31:21.655-08:002011-02-15T18:31:21.655-08:00Anonymous 1 and 2 fail to consider the possibility that perhaps there was enough human activity to effect the environment at the time-man-made fires, the clearing of vast amounts of land in converting from hunter-gatherer modes of production to agriculture and agro-pastoralism.
Of course, if you don't care about facts or science but would rather be contrarian for its own sake, so be it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628674231200432344.post-86497530303260275462011-02-15T18:23:50.713-08:002011-02-15T18:23:50.713-08:00Hello all, please let's keep the comments civil. Two points:
- The science is strong that the global warming we're experiencing today is largely (or entirely) human made.
-It's not known what caused the climate shift that occurred 4,200 years ago however it probably was a natural phenomenon of some sort.Owenhttp://www.unreportedheritagenews.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628674231200432344.post-22503224035381566782011-02-15T16:19:54.176-08:002011-02-15T16:19:54.176-08:00The previous comments are ignorant at best and complete bullshit at worst. Read the article instead of looking up the term global warming on google and posting your republican bullshit propaganda on every article with the term in it. By the way leave the science to real scientists and you can keep the opinions of your oil corporation "scientists" where you keep your heads, up in your Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628674231200432344.post-37896245870494198392011-02-15T15:09:52.816-08:002011-02-15T15:09:52.816-08:00Agree completely,anonymous #1.Science and politics do not mix and has been proven.Those with an agenda are politicians and those with an open mind are scientists.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3628674231200432344.post-61979226630404701052011-02-15T08:29:08.841-08:002011-02-15T08:29:08.841-08:00Whatever the cause 4200 years ago, it could not have been man induced. There were not enough of us around to manage it. Keep archaeology out of the global warming debate. The global warming 'scientists' are now a laughing stock for fudging 'evidence' and outright lying to the public. Keep their discomfort in their own discipline and out of archaeology if you want to be taken Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com
View the original article here